Comments on Popular Technology.net: Correcting misinformation about the journal Energy...

This journal is is now in ISI. This fundamentally ...

2011-05-05T17:39:09.059-04:00

This journal is is now in ISI. This fundamentally undermines the warmist argument that this journal is not peer reviewed SO THEREFORE it is not in ISI and THEREFORE it is no good. So now does the opposite apply? It is in ISI so it is THEREFORE peer reviewed and also good? Or are we going to see the grounds of argument shift? Is it now the case that ISI is no good, and not an arbiter of anything?<

Peer review is critical to maintaining the scienti...

2011-02-25T15:37:51.912-05:00

Peer review is critical to maintaining the scientific database free of all known errors, and it only takes one improperly done peer review to contaminate the scientific database resulting in critical decisions being made on faulty science as is the case for human caused global warming.
In 1981 SCIENCE published a peer reviewed paper:
Climate Impact of Increasing
Atmospheric Carbon

Good Work! Of course the demonizing and marginali...

2010-04-15T08:28:52.688-04:00

Good Work!

Of course the demonizing and marginalization of E&E is based not on rationality, but on following consciously or unconsciously the methods of propaganda.

This unfortunately implies that someone of said persuasions would read your article, accept at that moment the truth of it, and then the next day again be demonizing and marginalizing E&E just as before.