tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post8018600622774984394..comments2024-02-12T03:38:12.487-05:00Comments on Popular Technology.net: 1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW AlarmismUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger60125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-91824101203179400572024-01-30T14:39:30.504-05:002024-01-30T14:39:30.504-05:00Wouldn't the "climate change deniers"...Wouldn't the "climate change deniers" be the people who are trying to stop the climate from changing?The Davidtollahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17805179932887934985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-591413069773552932021-04-24T10:51:49.586-04:002021-04-24T10:51:49.586-04:00A quick [Ctrl F] search doesn't come up with a...A quick [Ctrl F] search doesn't come up with a criticism of the IPCC's Global Warming Potential (GWP) numbers primarily as they relate to methane. <br /><br />The GWP numbers are specifically designed to inflate the role of methane. Why? Because of all the compounds and their GWP numbers listed in the various appendices of the 5 IPCC reports, methane is the only one with a gram formula Steve Casehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06373421434514589060noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-89809593392589897922019-07-22T08:03:36.917-04:002019-07-22T08:03:36.917-04:00It would be nice if you would update this list wit...It would be nice if you would update this list with papers published after 2013.Quietmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06358928428524359594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-82160991090959561352019-01-02T17:03:29.484-05:002019-01-02T17:03:29.484-05:00Excellently encompassing a large number of points ...Excellently encompassing a large number of points of view to portray the true nature of the academic complexity of this unrecognized claim at the level of a Nobel-Prize in science, as it is expected for any comprehensively-investigated scientific issue. This is evidence of the need of Congress to initiate a hearing process with legitimate scientists. <br />Jimmy Vigo, PhD Environmental ToxicologyDr. JVigo, PhDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07317033813895086785noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-27957342236812910482015-11-08T15:23:59.489-05:002015-11-08T15:23:59.489-05:00McKitrick et al. (2010) is a standalone paper and ...McKitrick et al. (2010) is a standalone paper and is already included on the list. I do not consider it a supplemental paper to Douglass et al. (2007) even though it can be used as a rebuttal to Santer et al. (2008).<br /><br />I am also well aware the AGU should hire a competent webmaster.Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05170143101028077396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-53057874498143975092015-11-07T13:50:33.262-05:002015-11-07T13:50:33.262-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Alex Zeilstrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10162745398887819444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-89576440311692722542015-11-06T21:01:29.050-05:002015-11-06T21:01:29.050-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Alex Zeilstrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10162745398887819444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-31581429537546198482015-09-11T00:16:22.434-04:002015-09-11T00:16:22.434-04:001. When you click on the abstract link for the art...1. When you click on the abstract link for the article, "Response to Comment on Reconstructing Past Climate from Noisy Data" - the side menu has an option for "Full Text" and "Full Text (PDF)".<br /><br />2. It is not clear from Nature if "Scientific" Correspondence articles are peer-reviewed - <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/authors/gta/others.html#Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05170143101028077396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-45448726424148423652015-09-09T21:11:46.626-04:002015-09-09T21:11:46.626-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Alex Zeilstrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10162745398887819444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-7403819416225946922015-06-26T00:37:17.190-04:002015-06-26T00:37:17.190-04:00Thank you, that typo has been corrected.Thank you, that typo has been corrected.Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05170143101028077396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-91806977108977157122015-06-24T14:10:20.872-04:002015-06-24T14:10:20.872-04:00Andrew, I believe you meant to say "UAH"...Andrew, I believe you meant to say "UAH" when you said "UHA" when describing where John Christy works in a rebuttal to the common criticism, "There are no papers on the list that argue against AGW."Alex Zeilstrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10162745398887819444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-89541693165566976992014-03-07T11:17:28.507-05:002014-03-07T11:17:28.507-05:00cleanwater,
The greenhouse gas "effect"...cleanwater,<br /><br />The greenhouse gas "effect" has been disproved as early as 1909 by Robert W. Wood's experiment and even three occasions after Wood's experiment.<br /><br />http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2010/06/greenhouse-theory-disproven-in-1909.htmlRann Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00903808387907178630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-74482177594699326122014-02-23T09:51:40.305-05:002014-02-23T09:51:40.305-05:00I notice that PT has today, once again, been kicke...I notice that PT has today, once again, been kicked off andthentheresphysics blog. Their massive over reaction to any inoffensive comment that is against AGW is an indication of their insecurity. The global warming scare is dying because the science behind it is just junk. Keep up the good work.Polytropichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09549488781637666540noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-37951586369107438302014-01-21T21:55:06.782-05:002014-01-21T21:55:06.782-05:00Jamie, I will add them in the next update. If you ...Jamie, I will add them in the next update. If you want, you can just email them in the future to: populartechnology@gmail(dot)comAndrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05170143101028077396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-86551640418069155682014-01-21T21:27:48.977-05:002014-01-21T21:27:48.977-05:00New paper shows global warming decreases storm act...New paper shows global warming decreases storm activity and extreme weather<br /><br />http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/01/new-paper-shows-global-warming.html<br /><br />Cheers,<br />Jamie<br /><br />http://climatism.wordpress.com/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-10446023360810562112013-05-25T11:38:43.268-04:002013-05-25T11:38:43.268-04:00Hi Andrew,
Paper you may have, but couldn't fi...Hi Andrew,<br />Paper you may have, but couldn't find on "The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature" <br /><br />CO2 lagging temp change, which really turns the entire AGW argument on its head:<br /><br />http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818112001658<br /><br />Highlights:<br />► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 11Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12129076669174539322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-11187522752464356572013-03-20T00:22:04.004-04:002013-03-20T00:22:04.004-04:00Jamie, thank you for the paper and I added it to m...Jamie, thank you for the paper and I added it to my other list that covers green energy,<br /><br /><a href="http://z4.invisionfree.com/Popular_Technology/index.php?showtopic=3935" rel="nofollow">Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against "Green" Energy</a>Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05170143101028077396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-15362210830664737392013-03-20T00:01:51.035-04:002013-03-20T00:01:51.035-04:00Hi Andrew,
Thought you could update list with this...Hi Andrew,<br />Thought you could update list with this paper on Effects of industrial wind turbine noise on sleep and health<br />The study proves noise emissions from IWTs disturb sleep & impair mental health:<br />http://www.noiseandhealth.org/article.asp?issn=1463-1741;year=2012;volume=14;issue=60;spage=237;epage=243;aulast=Nissenbaum<br />Cheers<br />JamieJameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12129076669174539322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-66735689947592127102012-07-01T16:11:57.626-04:002012-07-01T16:11:57.626-04:00Hi Andrew,
Thought you might want to add these p...Hi Andrew, <br /><br />Thought you might want to add these papers to your list in the solar section:<br /><br />http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS/PDF/Pdf2006/Oct/El-Borie%20and%20Al-Thoyaib.pdf<br /><br />http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/18/251/2011/npg-18-251-2011.pdfahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11186997199760687982noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-22020752693241201302012-05-21T15:35:44.730-04:002012-05-21T15:35:44.730-04:00There is an experiment that proves that the Greenh...There is an experiment that proves that the Greenhouse gas effect does not exist. This experiment which has been peer reviewed by Ph.D physicists . Ph.D. Chemical engineers and others. The experiment is found on the web-site http:// www.slayingtheskydragon.com click on the blog tab. It is titled "The Experiment that failed which can save the world trillion-Proving the greenhouse gas effect cleanwaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05676441399182055961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-85239702775974912772012-04-22T11:56:57.907-04:002012-04-22T11:56:57.907-04:00http://forecast.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/docs/Lloyd-Hughes%2...http://forecast.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/docs/Lloyd-Hughes%2BSaunders.pdf<br /><br />Here is an important one about drought.Ian Weisshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06207227512713364278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-61532527646539298882011-12-14T00:50:09.214-05:002011-12-14T00:50:09.214-05:00There is no easy way to do that without using a sp...There is no easy way to do that without using a spreadsheet or database as the list is dynamic and changes.Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05170143101028077396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-30647893870106531292011-12-13T19:32:32.808-05:002011-12-13T19:32:32.808-05:00Could you number them?Could you number them?Rohhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00509627550462318102noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-16911150476177639582011-10-23T01:19:27.204-04:002011-10-23T01:19:27.204-04:00Thank you for this. I freely admit a bias towards ...Thank you for this. I freely admit a bias towards the "other side", but my bias is not sufficient to simply let me take "they're all in bed with Exxon" or "it's a settled matter" as an answer, anymore than I'm likely to be swayed by the cartoonish antics of many of the "deniers". I'm always on the lookout for facts that I can examine myself,Jeremy Harmonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05361689281386795812noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9481975.post-39311807442443334382011-10-13T00:10:00.153-04:002011-10-13T00:10:00.153-04:00If you email me your list I will look at it.If you email me your list I will look at it.Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05170143101028077396noreply@blogger.com